Here’s A Preliminary Chart Comparing Wii U, PlayStation 4 And Xbox One

xbox one got 8GB of RAM, 8 core processor, 500GB HDD and USB 3.0 this thing it could be really expensive…..and they haven’t talked about the GPU yet.

The games are great but why does nintendo continues making underpowered consoles?Did they become money lenders or something?

I feel sorry for you. Because you’re still stuck under your rock.

Yea. The graphics aren’t a priority. But it’s still a nice bonus to have. It also gives losers on the inernet something to argue about.

It’s a Blu-Ray drive, but licensing the movie playback codecs costs extra, so they left that part out.

Exactly. This has to be one of the worst charts I’ve seen lately.

Actually yes, the Wii U does use blu-ray, it just doesn’t support movie playback. The drive is a Blu-ray drive, however.

What will be embarassing is when the “underpowered” Wii U smacks the “powerful” competition! lol! Wii U will come out on top just like the Wii did with sales. Nintendo just makes the most money through the videogame market. 💋

That’s the point… FUN… I play a game to have FUN, retarted.

All video game consoles are toys, bro.
Specs never have and never will decide that.

yes! i can play Grand Turismo 6, The Last Of Us, Beyond Two Souls, Second Son, and DrivClub on the PC! oh how blind ive been all these years, all i really needed was a PC to play all these PS Exclusives. you sir, have completely changed the way i looked at games, and have finally set and end to all these Console wars. of the past.

/S

Wii U, 1080P, 60 frames per second. It has independent Sound card, it’s got 1GiG revealed for games. With another section cloaked. It Runs the engines below :

1) Unreal 4
2) Unity 4 next generation engine
3) Disruptor
4) CryEngine3 with ease { note CryEngine 3 is a better beast than Unreal 4 }
5) AnvilNext
6) Probably the Luminous Engine
7) Most definitely frost bite 2 and 3 { EA are origin butt hurt so that engine is not on the Wii U }
8) Rumored Retro Engine

So lie to us a little more please.

Windows 8 is the worst Windows ever.

Aka via streaming which uses a lot of data.

One person I know is an XBOX gamer, and he told me that he’s not getting a Wii U because it’s more for family games instead of action. He also bashed the PS3 for no apparent reason.

Get a PS2 at least, for the sake of Ar Tonelico 1 and 2, and the Atelier Iris and Mana Khemia game series’.
They’re worth the purchase. I speak from experience.

Thanks, I may Subscribe!

One of my favorite episodes.
The one about video game music is my all-time fav, though.

It’s not just that, it’s simply that Sony and Microsoft are failing to understand that by being too similar they’re being forced to share the same market, while Nintendo distinguishes itself with it’s exclusive content.
There’s not even a competition here, Nintendo is in a completely different ground and the only reason for Wii U’s slow start is that it focused on entering the SonySoft market by going “hardcore” instead of in creating a name of its own with it’s exclusivity.
In the end the market is gonna continue like it did in the PS3/360/Wii time because Nintendo’s console is, again, cost effective and offering a completely unique experience, while PS4 and One are pretty much a case of buying one for the price of two.

It may be unimportant, but it is true and undeniable.
But like I said, it doesn’t really matter, because Wii and PS2 were, markedly, the weakest consoles of their generations technically-wise and even so they ruled the market for years.
And the true reason for their success wasn’t on how they stood up to their competitors, but on how they were different.
With this, Microsoft is making the same mistake Sony did in the seventh generation, they’re replicating one another, splitting their market, while Nintendo is simply sitting in different ground.
For instance, they may talk all they want about graphics, the next CoD that won’t be on Wii U because it is too demanding of the system is probably gonna be in both PS4 and One, like always, and no matter how pretty they look and how fast they run, they’re gonna be the same in each console, meaning you won’t have to buy more than one of them if you want to play it, meanwhile, if you want to play Zelda U or the next 3D Mario, you’re gonna require a Wii U and that’s the end of it, it doesn’t really help that Sony and Microsoft have failed to amass a wide base of IPs to ensure their individuality, they’re still perceiving most of the public’s interest through second and third parties.
I bet you Sony and Microsoft are nearer to going SEGA than Nintendo despite Wii U’s poor launch, because this was a temporary occurrence that streamed from Nintendo competing with equal consoles in their ground, the second Wii U finds its footing in the very same place Wii and even GameCube stood, it’ll be unique enough to guarantee it’s perpetual existence.

You’re are and idiot. These nearly identical systems offered by Sony and MS are essentially seriously underpowered pc’s that just hook up to your TV. If anything the Wii U is far beyond the other two with what is capable on the system and changing gameplay and potentially improving it. The other two are the same as they used to be with slightly better specifications, but will not improve games or gameplay in any way, shape or form.

The Wii U is weaker then PS4/One but not in the same capacity as the Wii compared to PS3/360. The Wii couldn’t run any of the graphics engines that were used on most PS3/360 games, like Unreal Engine 3 for example. The difference this time, is that the Wii U can run all the graphics engines that PS4/One can. (EA’s claim about Frostbite 2-3 is crap, because they have those running on PS3/360, and the Wii U is more capable than them) Crytek has stated that Cry Engine 3 (which is on par or even better than Unreal 4 in some aspects) runs “beautifully” on the Wii U. Actual words.

The Wii U’s GPGPU is actually quite powerful, when used properly. It’s CPU is weak, but the GPGPU is designed to do many of the functions normally placed onto the CPU. When a developer builds a game on the 360, and then ports it over to PS3 and Wii U for example, they are essentially trying to make those consoles run in the same way that is optimal for the 360. That’s why you see framerate issues on PS3 and even Wii U versions of those games in many cases, because the PS3 and especially Wii U, were not designed to run in the same style.

Once we start to see games that have been built from scratch on the Wii U, as opposed to rushed 360 ports (games like Sonic and All Stars Racing Transformed and NFS:MW show that the Wii U versions can be superior, especially NFS:MW, that game was a pretty solid improvement over the PS3/360 versions) The Wii U will show that it’s more than just a small step ahead of PS3/360. One good example is Watch Dogs. They haven’t even started making the PS3/360 versions of the game, yet the Wii U version is being made along with the PS4/One version. If the Wii U was a generation behind, wouldn’t they be making the Wii U version at the same time they are making the PS3/360 version, instead of using the tools for the PS4/One version?

Go watch the video of Killzone on PS4. It’s pretty impressive. Nice explosion effects and graphics, and the draw distance is huge. Sony put a lot of effort into that clip, hard to say how early it is, or if it’s a game near completion that will be a launch title. That said, it’s a scripted shooter, that keeps you on a set path, and the visuals are all angular buildings and city scape.

Then go look up the game “X” for Wii U. That game is Monolith Software’s first attempt at a game with HD visuals. It’s in it’s very early stages, and aside from the bad looking placeholder water’s edge, the game also looks impressive. It has huge draw distances like Killzone, but unlike Killzone, which is a scripted shooter with “tunnels” that keep you from exploring the entire world, “X” allows you to go anywhere as an open world game. Notice in the scene when he jumps into the mech and flies off. That’s more impressive overall if you realize that you can go anywhere you want on that map, and there is no pop up or draw in, and the scenery is quite detailed, with waterfalls and vegetation rendering.

Maybe “X” won’t end up quite as pretty as Killzone. An open world game isn’t ever going to look quite as nice as a scripted shooter, because the amount of resources needed to run open world is more taxing than the shooter, so the shooter has better effects and crisper visuals. But the fact that the difference in graphics between a scripted PS4 game and a open world Wii U game are as small as they are, on top of the fact that Killzone is likely further along in development than “X” is, says a lot. You can’t look at Killzone and “X” and say the gap is the same as Killzone 3 and Xenoblade. Both sets of games were made by the same companies. One set on PS4/Wii U and the other on PS3/Wii. The Wii U is not a generation behind. It’s weaker, no denying that, but it’s not a whole generation behind like the Wii was compared to PS3/360. It’s just not so, and it can be proven.

yeah the disks and drive are based on bluray
nintendo isn’t gonna develop a whole new format just for a console^^

even the GDROM used in the sega dreamcast was basically just an enhanced capacity CD

the wii U isn’t able to play bluray movies however

AND ARE YPOU COMPARING EDRAM RENDERING TO SLOW AS FUCK GGDR5 AND ARE YOU COMPARING GENERIC SHADERS TO CUSTOM FIXED FUNCTION IL STOP BEFORE IMBARASING YOU

OH I WONT STOP IL ALSO ADD IV SEEN 500 GFLOP RATED GPUS BEAT 2TF GPUS IN BENCHMark gaming tests OWNED

FLAP ARMS AROUND AND SCREAM AT KINECT MIC

OR

TV AND APP NAVIGATE VIA A GAMEPAD TOUCH SCREEN OR WII REMOTE OWNED U GOT ONE BY U

AND THIS TRAP WAS SET MANY YEARS AGO I AM WIIBOY101 I SIAD IN 2003 MOTION POINTERS AND DISRUPTION BUSINESS TACTICS WOULD BE NINTENDOS SECRET WEAPON I THEN IN 2005 PUT MY MONEY WERE MY MOUTH WAS

REST IS HISTORY LOL XBOX 3RD ONE