The review scores are in from the latest edition of Japanese magazine Famitsu. There’s quite a few reviews this week but the one that will catch you attention is the review for Kirby Star Allies on the Nintendo Switch. The game received a review score of 35/40. As with all Famitsu reviews, there’s four reviewers. The four reviewers scored the game 8/9/9/9 which adds up to 35/40. Read on the for the rest of the reviews:
- Hoshi no Kirby: Star Allies score 35/40 (8/9/9/9)
- Shingeki no Kyojin 2 (Attack on Titan 2) score 36/40 (9/9/9/9)
- Future Card Buddyfight Tanjou! Oretachi no Saikyou Buddy! score 32/40 (8/8/8/8)
- Winning Post 8 2018 score 32/40 (8/8/8/8)
- Detention score 32/40 (7/8/9/8)
- Fe score 32/40 (7/8/8/9)
- Gal☆Gun 2 score 31/40 (8/8/7/8)
- Wan Nyan Dobutsu Byouin: Pet no Oishasan ni Narou! score 29/40 (8/7/7/7)
- Dear My Abyss score 28/40 (7/8/7/6)
- Link Picture Link-a-Pix score 28/40 (7/7/8/6)
- Earthlock score 27/40 (7/7/6/7)
- Kyogeki Quartet Fighters score 26/40 (7/6/7/6)
That’s pretty good. Seen a few negative comments about Kirby since the demo came out, mainly about it being a lot like other Kirby games, but all platformer Kirby games are basically the same basic formula so not sure what these people were expecting.
I can and have to agree with Kirby being way too similar in structure and plot these days. It’s more predictable and unchanged than Mario/Zelda combined.
The problem is that they didn’t even bother to create a new world like the Dreamstalk or Planet Robobot, Star Allies uses the exact same settings as Return to Dreamland.
I don’t expect Kirby to change much, but it feels extremely lazy that we’re back to Cookie Country.
Good
wasn’t this sonic forces rating too? lmao, i bet this game b better tho
Can you trust a magazine like Famitsu? Looks like advertized content can’t go lower than 32. Maybe there is a political (economic) reason behind.
Don’t know about this game, looks good for children, so maybe it’s justified. Certainly it’s big in content.