Skip to content

Nintendo interested in identifying associates of alleged Switch pirate

By now, you’re more than likely aware of the news that Nintendo has filed a lawsuit against James “Archbox” Williams, who is accused by Nintendo of Nintendo Switch piracy. Nintendo recently provided details on how the company managed to identify him in the first place. However, it seems that Nintendo doesn’t want to stop with just Williams. They’re interested in identifying his business associates too.

You see, late last week, Nintendo issued another court file. There, the company is asking the court for permission to subpoena internet domain companies such as Name Cheap, Go Daddy and Tucows. They also want to subpoena Cloudflare, GitHub, Discord, Google, and Reddit. This is because Nintendo wants business records so they can find more pirates to sue. More specifically, Nintendo wants to go after people that Williams may have ties to and associated with, saying that “the purpose of all of the requested subpoenas is to seek relevant information that is necessary for NOA to pursue infringement claims”.

Nintendo was particularly interested in Reddit, with the company saying that “Defendant was a primary moderator of the SwitchPirates community, under the name ‘Archbox,’ which boasted more than 190,000 members. Nintendo has reason to believe that other accounts active in the SwitchPirates community may also have been controlled by Defendant, or else reflect other individuals who have worked alongside Defendant”. So, it seems that the r/SwitchPirates subreddit is likely to be Nintendo’s #1 target of their hunt for Williams’ associates.

Source / Via

20 thoughts on “Nintendo interested in identifying associates of alleged Switch pirate”

  1. Nintendo wants both attention and the spread of misery.

    But we don’t always get what we want. Why should Nintendo be any different.

    1. Aaah… So you’re on the good ol’ bandwagon: “I don’t want payment for a job I’ve done”, yeah?
      Good luck in a world where money sadly talks, my good person :)

    2. I would absolutely love it if you made the all time perfect video game, crowned a 200% on Metacritic and billions of dollars in sales. Then you come with the perfect sequel to this game, and then someone to come along and pirate both games (second one ahead of release), and see if your attitude would change on the subject.

    1. That’s like saying driving is legal in the United States. Technically it is, but there are a lot of ways you can drive a car that are NOT legal. There are a lot of emulation related activities that are NOT legal. Especially streaming games that haven’t even been released yet, which is the reason Nintendo is pissed at this guy.

  2. I’m all for emulation and games preservation but not when people think they are entitled to “free” games.

  3. Whenever theres an article about nintendo squashing piracy, these comment sections always make me feel sick. Do you guys genuinely believe that anyone is benefitting from this?

    Morality does not equal legality.

  4. This situation shows how seriously companies are starting to treat digital piracy and related investigations.
    When legal action expands beyond individuals to associates, transparency and proper documentation become essential.
    Access to verified public case information, such as Genesee Legal Records , helps people understand how similar cases are handled within the legal system. It also highlights the growing connection between technology disputes and traditional legal accountability.

Leave a Reply to fixed camera guyCancel reply

Discover more from My Nintendo News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading