Skip to content

Finalists Revealed For The World Video Game Hall of Fame

The Strong National Museum of Play in New York has announced 15 finalists for its very own World Video Game Hall of Fame. Thousands of votes from over 100 different countries decided the 15 finalists which are (in no particular order):

  • Elite
  • Final Fantasy
  • Grand Theft Auto III
  • John Madden Football
  • The Legend of Zelda
  • Minecraft
  • Nürburgring
  • The Oregon Trail
  • Pokemon Red and Green
  • Sid Meier’s Civilization
  • The Sims
  • Sonic The Hedgehog
  • Space Invaders
  • Street Fighter III
  • Tomb Raider

The Museum of Play advises that “The World Video Game Hall of Fame recognizes electronic games that meet the following criteria: icon-status, the game is widely recognized and remembered; longevity, the game is more than a passing fad and has enjoyed popularity over time; geographical reach, the game meets the above criteria across international boundaries; and influence, the game has exerted significant influence on the design and development of other games, on other forms of entertainment, or on popular culture and society in general.”

The final inductees to get a place in the hall of fame, chosen from the 15 finalists, will be announced on May 5 at the The Strong museum.

Source

42 thoughts on “Finalists Revealed For The World Video Game Hall of Fame”

    1. If they was going to nominate a football game, I would have like Tecmo Bowl instead of John Madden. I’m not running so I just their decision is okay.

  1. These vote-based lists never work that well at all, of course this one would be a joke too. What I find most insulting is that they couldn’t even get their criteria straight. Picking Final Fantasy instead of Dragon Quest is a travesty. I guess it makes sense if they’re doing it because they consider it to be more influential (which I think it’s arguable, but understandable), but then again they have SFIII instead of SFII.

    1. SFII vs SFIII is a tough one. I’d think SFII should have the nomination because of what a groundbreaking fighting game it was, it is basically what Super Mario Bros was to platforming but to fighting games. But I know that SFIII is considered THE best fighting game of all time by many people…

        1. They should have street fighter in general just like the did John madden football unless the saying the original John madden.

        1. And you should try to read ALL the criteria, not just the two you mention. If you considered all then there’s no contradiction in their elections, tastes aside.

          1. That’s my point. The criteria don’t make any sense BECAUSE some of the picks directly contradict it. See SFIII.

            If you aren’t willing to read the body of the article before replying to me, at least have the common decency of actually reading (and understanding, mind you) the post you’re replying to.

            1. Who say I don’t read it? Let me tell you a secret: “World Video Game Hall of Fame” is not just the headline, is also the title of the whole thing. I think is safe to assume that fame is one of the most influential criteria.
              Anyway SFIII meets most of the criteria, that’s MY point.

              1. And SFII fits much better with the rest of the picks and the criteria as a whole, which means SFIII is a strange pick that, in my view, discredits the rest. Not to mention, if fame was the main criterion, you’d see Ocarina and FFVII up there instead of the originals.

                No matter how you look at it, the logic behind the choices is flawed.

                1. That’s YOUR opinion, a subjective thing.
                  Both SF II and SF III have well fame, maybe SF II has more, but it’s not a big difference (FF and DQ, on the other hand, the difference on fame is huge outside japan). Now, if you considered the rest of the criteria, the difference is more notorious. Like I said earlier, tastes aside (this people have also their own opinion)

                  1. You are claiming that SFIII is more famous than SFII. You are fucking delusional, mate. Nothing subjective about that.

                    If with that “rest of the criteria” you’re addressing the SF2vs3 case, I’m sorry but you’re complete, utterly wrong. Even disregarding popularity, SFII is still more recognizable and influential, both culturally and within the industry. If you’re addressing the DQvsFF argument, then I agree. Still, if they pick FF for those reasons, they should pick SFII for those same reasons. If not (SFIII’s case), they should pick DQ. It’s as simple as that, I can’t put it any more clearly.

                    1. “You are claiming that SFIII is more famous than SFII.”

                      Hah, funny thing, you tell me earlier to read more… But maybe you should read my post again.

                      1. Fair enough, let me rephrase that:
                        You are defending that someone on his right mind would claim that SFIII is more famous than SFII, which is fucking delusional.

                        That said, I can’t grasp at why would you do that if that wasn’t your mentality in the first place. Also, the actual arguments are below those two sentences. Try reading those.

                      2. Okay, I did not want to write much because English is not my mother tongue, but here we go…
                        Lets say you have 10 criteria, and you need to choose between 2 games. The first game is better on 6/10 criteria, and the other on 4, so you choose the first one. Now, you have another 2 games, and again, one have 6 and other 4… BUT, that 6 criteria of the winner are NOT the same of the first winner, they just have 2 criteria on common. No contradiction, no logic hole, just opinions when you choose the better on every criteria. Greetings and excuse my English.

                        1. As I said before, that’s not what’s happening here. You’d be completely right if that were the case, it’s just not. SFII is just that much more influential AND popular. What you can’t do is change the weight of the criteria based on the games, which is what seems to be happening here. All fit but SFIII, which is the oddball.

        2. The original Final Fantasy? That one’s pretty mediocre in comparison with it’s future installments.
          I know it introduced many RPG elements and pretty much saved the whole genre, but you just can’t compare it to FFVI, FFVII, FFIX, FFX or even other entries honestly.

        3. I was going to ask where is Super Mario Bros but someone already clarified that for me. So my question is, is Chrono Trigger already in this Hall of Fame? If it’s not, why isn’t it a nominee, damn it!?

        Leave a Reply

        Discover more from My Nintendo News

        Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

        Continue reading