Warner Bros Registers New Batman Arkham Domain Names

batman_arkham_city

Warner Bros, the publishers behind the incredibly successful Batman: Arkham Asylum and Batman: Arkham City, have registered a number of domain names. The domain names suggest that Warner Bros are busy looking at creating a sequel to Batman: Arkham City, which appeared on the Wii U at the systems launch. Here’s the domain names that Warner Bros has registered.

  • ArkahmUniverse.com
  • BatmanArkhamUniverse.com
  • BatmanArkhamArises.com
  • BatmanArkhamBegins.com
  • BatmanArkhamDarkKnight.com
  • BatmanArkhamKnight.com
  • BatmanArkhamLegend.com
  • BatmanArkhamLegends.com
  • BatmanArkhamNight.com
  • BatmanArkhamOrigins.com
  • BatmanArkhamStories.com
  • DarkKnightArkham.com
  • DCArkhamUniverse.com
  • DACrkhamVerse.com
  • TheArkhamUniverse.com

 

155 thoughts on “Warner Bros Registers New Batman Arkham Domain Names”

      1. Batman Arkhum city armoured edition is awesome on the wiiu. Looks really sharp and nice and plays like a beast. Don’t understand some of the negative press it recieved , I barely ran into one Framerate issue at all.

        Like

          1. Says the butthurt `3 year old who still worships his dusty , yellow ass 360 which is 7 years old and can only afford games from 2009.

            Wiiu is a beast. The fact that you can’t handle the triuth exposes your ass.

            I am impressed with what I see from the Wiiu launch , and it’s scary to think how good the next Smash bros and Zelda games will look.

            Just remember , 360 launch titles looked like uprezzed Xbox 1 games. Wiiu launch games look like Assassins creed 3 , Mass effect 3 , Trine 2 directors cut etc.

            Like

              1. You have resorted to Ad Hominem a logical fallacy. Your internet score has been deducted by 1, and you have conceded defeat in this argument.
                You fail to provide any reasoning or statistical evidence supporting your point, so your arguments from henceforth will be ignored. :D

                Like

            1. I’m not impressed with the launch at all, but then again, I’ve never been impressed with anythings launch. Either way, I shall join you Wii U owners by the end of March.

              Like

              1. The ps3 and 360 launches were terrible. They didn’t demonstrate what they could do graphically for 6Months+ prior to launch , and on top of that the games were shit.

                N64 was an incredible launch , Super mario 64 . Gamecube was an impressive Launch , Luigi’s Mansion was graphically unbelievable.

                Like

                1. Eh, I still haven’t thought a launch was impressive to date. If I had to pick one though, it would be the SNES or maybe the PS2.

                  Like

                  1. Ps2 was OK. It didn’t demonstrate Graphics Much better than Dreamcast at launch though. Although it destroyed dreamcast graphics not too long after that.

                    The Gamecube Destroyed the Ps2’s graphics straight out of the box. Luigi’s Mansion and Star wars Rogue squadron 2 were just unvelievable.

                    Whilst the graphics of wiiu at launch are on par , give or take with 7 year old optimized 360. It’s not the graphics that have impressed me , it’s the controller , Miiverse , Off screen play , Asymetric multiplayer etc.

                    All those things are equaly , if not more impressive than just a petty graphical leap imo.

                    Like

                    1. ALso, the off screen play does sound pretty enticing, asymetric though I found a tad bit frustrating, probably because I ain’t use to it xD

                      Like

                    2. Actually the Wii U’s clock speed would put it up with the power of the PS3 and have you seen the graphics on that thing… they are flipping amazing for a 6 year old consoles.

                      Wii U though has far better graphics

                      Like

          1. People were lying about the framerate. Cus although it does suffer from a few irrelivant drops , Digital Foundry proved it has a slightly HIGHER avergage framerate than the 360 and ps3 version , reaching heights of 45 FPS…

            Like

        1. Don’t be biased, it’s a lazy port. The Wii U is amazing! I love my Wii U! But the Wii U version does suffer from FPS drops from time-to-time.

          Like

    1. AAAAw, ^^ I just want to hold U tight and Drown U in the Tub. . . . ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^

      Like

  1. Sorry if i repeat my comment again, I just want to give a message to the Haters;

    for those haters out there i have a message for you: You dont have Childhood Memories but if you do, you are sucked at World 1-1

    And this image proves some “haredcore” gamers out there

    How you could be called as hardcore if you use Lag Switch and other CHEAT devices in COD and other online games. Im sure of it. I would recommend you play casual games lass efforts and best for lazzines ;)

    Also, i also love sony and microsoft regarding on the graphics and gameplay, I also have an PS1 the only non-nintendo console i ever have, especially twisted metal and final fantasy on psone.
    But I greatly love and respect nintendo A LOT because of their history from 1880′s to 2013 from hanafuda cards or playing cards to the nintendo as we know today ;)

    And please tell me why microsoft is the “BEST” video game maker and nintendo sucks if you only own xbox or sony? oh i see, your judging by the cover. You no childhood memories my friend. Microsoft and Sony are like atari and i’ll place that as your homework. Have a great researching my friend :) Time to use wikipedia and google again my friend. I need a good reason.

    Thank You for grabbing some opportunity to read this…

    Like

    1. Like the way WB games had done with Armoured edition ? That game looks great by 360 standards , But I expect that when people take full advantage of the wiiu , it will make Arkhum city Armoured edition look dated.

      That game is a good launch port. But it definitely shows signs of limited porting time , funds , staff , etc.

      I would give the game about 8.2/10. It’s awesome , but they could of made it dramatically better.

      Like

    1. Neither can Nintendo systems. Hell, some current gen games would make the Wii U explode in flames if they were run on that underpowered load of shit.

      Like

    2. What does masculinity have to do with video games? Exactly…nothing. Are you trying to be like the cavemen? Having to show off being many to impress you’re cavewoman? I’m sorry that you like cavewomen but oh well. Seriously manliness has nothing to to with gaming.

      Like

          1. The funny thing is Unation , That is the earlier wiiu dev kit/ build. They could make it look better with the newer Wiiu build. Although I can’t imagine how that could look better.

            Like

        1. *facepalm*
          It’s people like you that run society down.
          You’re either immensely stupid, or just spend your time doing the most meaningless thing ever, either way, your contribution to society is laughable and your existance is pointless. Please go live on the moon or something.

          Like

          1. The moon has less gravity than earth, so they would theoretically outlive everyone on the earth…. You need to send them to Jupiter or something.

            Like

      1. Never say never. Remember WB Games President’s commentary about the Wii U? If they can do it with Batman: Arkham City: Armored Edition, they can do it again with another Batman title for the Wii U. Don’t be an asshurt drone by changing your fucking mind… just accept it.

        Like

  2. wow really? batman is nt gonna be on loser wii u. it has shit graphics i seen better on the genesis. i bet shitendo is gonna keep making gimmicky shit like wii u for the casuals except casuals don’t like shitendo anymore they play on iphones and tablets but not wii u. so shitendo has lost hardcores and casuals? noww what? i bet iwata and miyamoto will cry into each others asshole to make each feel better for making such a shit company. i cant believe dumbass kids and pedophiles still support such an old otaku shit company. holy shit fucking weaboos dancing around waiting for the next Milked Mario or Legend of Gayda just they can escape from their shit real lifes as a loser virgin with big fat belly and bald head. gay cunts need to play some real hardcore consoles or PC. okay fags. shitendo sucks dick and will die!

    Like

    1. ░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
      ░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
      ░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
      ░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
      ░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
      █░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
      █░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
      ░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
      ░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
      ░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
      ░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
      ░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
      ░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
      ░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
      ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░

      Problem?

      Like

  3. I hope Nintendo, Sorny and Microshit replaces christianity, islam and juduism.
    Atleast no one getshurt and it’s actually fun fighting over a technological superior media like theinternet u like the religions primitive books and pathetic rituals.

    Like

    1. Shut up unmanly Nintendo lover. I’m outside all the time camping in the wilderness, like a manly man does. I have friends from the gym and I banged more girls than your small dick could dream of.

      Like

      1. What you just said really makes you sound like a try hard. Don’t bother saying I’m a Nintendo lover either, because I ain’t, I’m a PC player if anything.

        Like

  4. What’s next?

    Batman: Arkham Supermarket
    Batman: Arkham Poundland
    Batman: Arkham Fast-Food Restaurant
    Batman: Arkham Disk jobs
    Batman: Arkham Flower Store
    Batman: Arkham Why the fuck can’t we just name the next batman game something different than just Arkham?

    That last one, I’d totally buy it

    Like

  5. Almost all of these sound like plausible titles for a sequel to Batman Arkham City. And from what I hear, the story was open ended enough that a sequel would be a great idea.

    Like

      1. BE manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly
        manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly
        manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly manly

        Like

                    1. No actually, the strong (or “manly” as you bluntly put it) are supposed to use their strength responsibly and protect the weak. Chuck Norris would be ashamed of you. And calling people weak does not make them strong, in fact it ruins their potentially already low self-esteem and makes them even weaker most of the time.

                      Plus, if you feel you have to exert your “manliness” in such a way you are doing, that makes you pretty weak according to your definitions.

                      Like

              1. You’re right I’m HIV positive because I play Pokémon and I have a Pokémon fetish and sexy Pikachu I met at the Halloween party got me infected.

                Like

          1. So…. listing to Groover’s Talking Testicles is suppose to help kids decide not to put things into their mouths… SEEMS LEGIT TO ME!!

            Like

      2. From your previous comments, I thought the two Arkham games would be right up your alley. Muscle-clad men beating up other people, on of the best and darkest video game stories of this generation, and freaking Batman. What’s not, according to your definitions, “manly” about that?

        Like

  6. I don’t know what’s more immature, Bill or the amount of people stealing his name .,… I think I’ll choose the amount of people stealing his name, quite sad indeed.

    Like

  7. I am the real Bill, a manly man who sucks cock for a living, I come to this site to pick on you Nintendo faggots. Grow up and get a real console, kiddies.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s