The hardworking team over at Source Gaming have taken another look at The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and have dissected a new timeline theory based on recent information from Nintendo. Have a watch below and see if you agree with their findings!
Video: Source Gaming Looks At Zelda Breath Of The Wild Timeline Theory
No, this is not made with logic in the forefront.
You cannot validate “DLC costumes” as evidence towards any kind of timeline.
Furthermore, admitting to have had the same “word for word” thoughts as MatPat… Do I need to say more..?
||Everything anyone says except High Command is irrelevant anyway…||
Exactly my meaning Commander!
He completely disregarded Grand Designer Aonuma’s word and therefore is being intentionally misleading, simply for YouTube stardom, at worst.
Or an imbecile at best…
Commander, I am reviving this halfyear-old communications link to address a potential issue.
We currently have at least two seemingly unofficial “Nintendo First Order”-members, one ‘Reaver’ and one ‘Officer’, neither of which follow our creed wit of communication..
Do we best establish a new orginization?
Or should we somehow proclaim our status as the true members?
||Reaver is official but Officer not really…||
||I will probably do something soon…||
Thank you for your quick response, your excellence.
I will await, and fulfill your every order!
Enforcer out.
You should make Officer an official member of your group as he’s doing a splendid job defending Nintendo. I don’t agree with everything he defends them on but he seems trustworthy enough.
||Yes, I’ve noticed…||
Interesting theory. But it’s just that: a theory. If that is what is happening with BotW, I’m sure Nintendo will reveal it to us sooner or later. (Hopefully…)
I tend to agree with the theory that all three of the timelines converge over time into one again, like the base at the beginning. As off the wall as that sounds, I would rather that be canon than the other games only being “legends.” That’s just terrible.