Skip to content

Nintendo: Sony’s Super Smash Bros Clone Is Basically Confirmed And Is Named Title Fight

Rumours emerged a month or so ago that Sony were working on their own Super Smash Bros clone and it now appears as though the title is coming into fruition. According to the Paul Gale Network the game is named Title Fight and is a joint venture from Sony and Superbot Entertainment.

The project is said to feature a host of characters from Sony’s first-party studios including  Uncharted’s Nathan Drake, Twisted Metal’s Sweet Tooth, Killzone’s Colonel Radec, Fat Princess, Kratos, Sly Cooper and PaRappa the Rapper. Super Bot and Sony are currently on the verge of announcing the game.

278 thoughts on “Nintendo: Sony’s Super Smash Bros Clone Is Basically Confirmed And Is Named Title Fight”

  1. Lame name really and it gonna be boring since none of those characters they own are interesting. Just a bunch of humanoid.

    1. the only one i really like is sly cooper but why is there no rachet you think he’d be in there……well back skyward sword

      1. im 100% sure that if this is real, 1. they wouldn’t announce all the characters and 2. ratchet will be in this no doubt. alright, back to skyward sword as well!!!

    2. noname aka mario aka um what aka anonymous aka CJ aka nintendo equals love aka First Stopper

      Do people still buy the wii? I mean WTF? The wii is garbage, why does my NES has better graphics than this piece of shit. Second, what is the fucking point of swinging the retarded controler around… it looks like a fucking dildo. The only place I have seen people swinging their arms around like that was in a rave club for gay man. And what is the point of that fucking wii fit thing, not everyone is a stupid fat fuck who needs to excersice, if you want to exercise go to a fucking gym you lazy bastards.

      1. lol you saw people swinging there arms around in a rave club for gay men. i know where you spend your weekends LAWL

        1. Yeah it’s funny how his words can easily be used against him but he actually succeeded considering the number of people that responded to him. The term “Don’t feed the trolls” means don’t respond at all since they only want to see how people react and laugh at it.

          1. What I’m laughing at is the fact he has nothing better to do than troll around, why not go and read something that either interests him, or go soak in the fount of knowledge that is the internet, and come back with something intelligent and insightful to say.

      2. wow some one has way to much time on there hands to be heading to gay rave clubs with didldos to wave them around … yes real man here >.> twat

      3. yeah right the wii is shit i mean the wii controller…sony for the win…oh wait i forgot …sony has a wanna be wii controller…doesnt that make sony succk?
        nintendo for ever!!!!!
        your soooooo stupid

    3. Well Nintendo stated themselves that they go the idea for the wii from the playstation eye toy ‘insert troll face here’

        1. Probably not, SEGA don’t have a close relationship with Sony like Nintendo, and the fact that Sonic was in Brawl is probably going to affect Sony’s choice-
          As for Snake, since it’s in Brawl it probably going to affect Sony’s choice too, but that depends on the company.

      1. They will probably be in it the game hasn’t been officially announced yet so the full roster obviously won’t be announced just yet (also they aren’t first party but still a chance)

    1. Yes, let’s let some sack that somehow has a gender run around the screen while some rated m men try to shoot him. He has no weapons, the only thing he/it has is… grabbing… things…

      1. Ok, then I can do a deep analyse of this *beep* *beep*… DONE! Sony has done it again… Cloned Nintendo stuff. As usuall! Nothing new to see here!

        1. It’s a partnership stoop. Nintendo and Sony AGREED on making a game TOGETHER. Sony isn’t “cloning” anything. If anything, Nintendo is pooping out tweaked “clones” of SSB.

          IMO, if this is true, it’s really cool that they’re crossing their competitive borders and cooperating to make a game. Plus, this means, I can play SSB on my PS3. :D They better have Cole though. :O

          1. It’s not a partnership, it’s just a clone. -.-” Get your fact right “stoop”.

            But yah, they better have Cole, and they probably will.

            1. Stop replying to this troll, can’t you see it’s the same person? Ignore anything with that avatar on this site. It’s a lame troll.

                1. No, it’s the same guy. He’s been making stupid comments and replying to himself for a while now. Just ignore the troll until he stops acting insane

          2. Why would i want this game anyway, if i have Mortal Kombat 9 where i can play as my only Sony Favorite Character, Kratos is more than enough for me.
            Also knowing that it’s probably going to have big mass of blood, so it’s not my kind of game, ironic since i have Mortal Kombat lol.

          1. exactly, its just a rumor.. theirs also a rumor going around that your mom gives it up for a ham sandwich… now is it true?

      1. Yes I have, and I’ve played all 3 of the games. But I still don’t get how it’s Ninetndo related in any way. It’s not like it will come to Wii U or 3DS so for Nintendo gamers this is a completly inrelevant to talk about.

        The only thing this could be for is to spread Sony hate and start a trollraid on every sony forum in the world.

          1. It’s in direct competition to an amazing, nintendo game, because at this point nobody knows whether it will be the same as SSB in fighting styles, physics, etc. But it seems to be the same brain child, using favoured characters from good games all together fighting. It’s relevant now, SO WE CAN GO DESTROY SONY FOR BEING SO PRESUMPTUOUS, everyone don your favourite SMASH BROS. character mask and assault SONY headquarters!!

        1. It’s related to Nintendo because rumors suggest this is a clone to SSB. It’s not bashing Sony in anyway, but it’s relavent to Nintendo. Kinda like how Move ripped off Wii’s design.

                    1. noname aka mario aka um what aka anonymous aka CJ aka nintendo equals love aka First Stopper

                      Where’s your spacebar faggot? And besides it just misses the icon.

                      You=Fail

  2. I genuinely have NEVER heard of a single one of those characters: Fat Princess? PaRappa the Rapper? It sounds like they just threw the first words that came into their heads onto the drawing board.
    This clone will absolutely fail.

    1. I’ve heard of them all except Fat Princess and Sweet whatever. However, the games on the list I’ve played/give care about at all, only one of them.

        1. Remember people, this is a Nintendo site. You aren’t expected to know these characters like Sweet Tooth… Just like some Sony fanboys would look at you strange when you bring up Pit or Ridley

            1. No. They are all pretty common.

              And I think fat princess is from some type of arcade game on PSN. They must have ran out of characters and moved to cheap $5 games. lol.

    2. Drake and Kratos are hugely famous, Fat Princess was a small success (and actually a very good game) and Parappa is actually very famous for people of my generation, and surely even more for the next one as i was already in my teenage years when it came out. it was incredibly big at the time, i think maybe the first console rhythm game to have success in the west, but i can only talk about Europe and Japan.
      but i agree, it will surely fail as, despite what sony thinks, they don’t really have any character famous or dear enough to attract all kinds of audience. Nintendo has been creating a huge amount of famous franchises and characters for the last 30 years, so they could do “Smash Bros”, Square-Enix had 20+ years of success with “Final Fantasy” so they could do “Dissidia”, Namco had 15 years of success with the “Tales of” games so they couid come up with “Tales of VS”. Sony simply can’t.

      1. wrong!! the call of duty series isnt that old and its out selling 25 year old mascots, yes for older folks nostolgia plays a big role, but the newer gen of gamers just want violence, so aslong as SSB (Sonys Smash Bros) is fast paced, violent, bloodly, and Gory.. itll do well. hell i know ill be getting it if the trailer gets my attention. then again im not dick ridding nintendo, im a gamer who own all 5 consoles.

            1. Personally I believe you’re wrong, people want to see how their favoured characters stack up against others, story has a huge role to play in many video games nowadays, NOT just bloodshed and violence. If there was no story there would be no point, you wouldn’t feel as though you’re achieving anything, except in Multiplayer online when you prove you’re faster than the other guy sighting down his barrel at you. But this is one style of game that will flop, especially in direct comparison to SSB, it doesn’t have the character line-up, and dare I say it win’t have as many little things or attention to very minor details and character traits, to make this an arcade style fighting game people will want to play like they have for SSB, and others of the genre, it’s very hard to make it in that particular genre of games, I think it will flop as Christian stated.

        1. This is a fanboy site for Nintendo. And I doubt you have heard about every N64 game, evar. Even them Japan exclusive ones.

    3. In that case your missing out. I hate nintendo fanboys. Go play other games!!! Parrapas been around since the ps1. Nintendos first party games are fun but if youd like to play more than 3 good games a year then buy another console.

      1. @Anonymous then get the fuck out if you hate nintendo fanboys this is a site for nintendo fans so they can play what the fuck they want and im sure the only like nintendo games and WTF do you mean 3 good games a year? you talking shit about nintendo?

        1. if its a nintendo site, why the fuck do you guys care about a ps3 game so much?

          its just gonna be a clone of the worlds worst fighting game,
          stop acting like tough shit on the internet bro

            1. I agree with you about the Broaden your mind before complaining, or just don’t complain at all, I play Xbox and nintendo, just never liked playstation games, I think it has to do with the tiny controllers and my hands being rather to large to deal with them, and simply hate on it sometimes to keep up appearances, But I miss the days of twisted metal….sigh

      2. It’s called “mynintendonews”. I’m not gonna tell you to get out, but the longer you stay in here, the sadder your life is…

    1. because it’s about a fighting game by sony that involves 1st party characters, which is a concept that nintendo made a game out of 12 years ago. sure, the gameplay style may be diifferent, but it’s still a game about a bunch of first party characters fighting each other.

      i feel that fans of nintendo deserve to know whenever sony decides to copy something of nintendo’s, like with the playstation move or that article that said the vita could be used with the PS3 like the wii u controller. since this game seems to be taking a concept nintendo has successfully used, it relates to nintendo, making it *gasp* NINTENDO NEWS!

      now then, if dissenters like you can stop posting stupid comments related to “this isn’t nintendo news!” or “this is just troll bait/meant to start flame wars!”, there would be less arguments around articles like this

    1. You do realize you can’t call it a clone since you haven’t seen any gameplay. And it’s not a Super Smash Bros ripoff, it’s just a game in the mix genre. It’s like if you called Marvel VS. Capcom, Tekken VS. Streetfighter, or Mortal Kombat VS. DC a Super Smash Bros ripoff. Really, get some sense.

      1. Hmmm a systems exclusive charaters from different worlds pitted against one another in a button masher is exactly a SMASH BROS. CLONE! I saw what sweet tooth looks like and he looked retarded! I wasn’t impressed by what I saw AT ALL.

          1. Ok smash bros is more of a beat em’ up fighter than a button masher, idgaf. This game still looks stupid.(at least sweet tooth)

      2. no we can’t say it’s a clone till we have seen gameplay footage, but we can say the idea was most likely spawned from thoughts of SSB, seeing as they are Sony characters who have never had anything to do with one another till now, in a fighting game, I heard this same Idea gee last time when, oh super smash bros. was coming out. Oh as well those games you mentioned above, can’t be ripoffs of SSB seeing as none of them are characters owned solely by one company, ssssoooooooo super smash ripoff, me and possibly the rest of the world agrees.

  3. Well im certainly looking foward to playing it despite what you nintendo fanboys say about it being copied (I know thats the case). Besides it didnt say those were the only characters just some. Now the name sucks, lack of creation there thats for sure. I dont like brawl etc. so I dont know if ill like this anymore but my little brother will probally out down his brawl for this!

  4. I won’t call it a clone just yet. We have no details other that it’s name and it’s characters. Gameplay may be very different. Could be less of a party game, may be 3D, may be more “mature” (like mortal combat). We don’t know enough to call it a SSB clone yet.

    Surely if taking a group of charcters from different franchises and putting them in a fighting game classifies it as a SSB clone then Marvel vs. Capcom is, or Tatsunoku vs. Capcom? I didn’t see much “PLAGIARISM DERP” when these were announced though.

  5. Considering how popular SSB has been since it first came out for N64, I’m surprised it took so long for a clone to appear…

    But do we actually know if the gameplay is similar to SSB? I don’t think it’s fair to call this game a rip-off when plenty of fighters pull characters from different sources.

    1. TMNT smash up was a SSB clone. stupidly on PS2 along with Wii. it was fine it was on Wii, but PS2? c’mon… how can you even enjoy SSB with 2 players, MAX? fail.

      1. That was done by one of the teams that worked in SSBB. They were able to slip that out due to their work with the game. Otherwise, I think Nintendo has the fighting system trademarked so that others won’t imitate that. That event may lead Nintendo to be more strict with the developers they hire to work on their franchises. All of that for a small success.

    2. You do know Cartoon Network Explosion Time is the perfect ripoff for SSB right? its like they stold the smash engine but sucked ass at using it.. honestly it fucking sucks.

  6. Well I own a PS3 so I’m kinda curious. I just hope its not a total flop. We don’t need PS fuckin shit up for Nintendo. Please don’t let Smash Bros go down in shame. I hope u know what your doin Nintendo.

    1. Nope. Not even a screenshot. Every single detail about this game that is out in the public is nothing more than a rumor at this point. Heck, even “Title Fight” is rumored to be its CODENAME, not the actual name of the game. But we’ll see. Sometime next year, more info will reveal itself.

  7. I never thought Sony would go there, cause in my opinion Sony doesn’t have enough characters with personality, and a lot of them aren’t that well known as Nintendo’s Mario, Samus, Kirby, Link and Pikachu. You get my point. If this is gonna happen they should atleast try to add some characters like Crash Bandicoot and Sackboy.

  8. Only reason I might get this is because it has Drake, Kratos, and PaRappa.Seems interesting but the fact that it’s basically copying SSB is kind of making me not want it.Idk I’ll have to see the final product.

  9. Other than Fat Princess, I’ve heard of all the names here. The only sad thing is that characters that would probably work for Sony, like Crash Bandicoot and Spyro, aren’t Sony’s anymore. Not to mention their inclusion would have enough nostalgia to get me to consider the game, but as it stands I can’t see anything that would get me to try out this game… of course, we haven’t seen any gameplay, so any judgement now is very premature.

  10. Sony also tried to make a Mario kart clone and we all know how that was. It had awesome features but nothing beats the original. Sony’s characters don’t have enough magic for me to be interested in them.

    1. I think its great. I’m a gamer some of you folks may have heard of us. We play games for fun and not give much care to what console they are on.

      It would be awesome to play smash bros with characters from all over the world of gaming but as that will never happen we’ll have to go with the closest thing we can get even if it is as rumoured a clone.

      1. ModNation does suck I tried it like 10 times I thought I would like it cause it’s like Mario Kart but I didn’t same with Littlebig Planet.

    2. I don’t know what “Mario Kart clone” you’re talking about, but I hope it’s not Modnation racers… that’s not a clone. Now, what is pretty much a clone is Crash Bandicoot’s kart racer… which was still an absolutely amazing game. If they can take that magic and bring it to this fighter, then this game will rock.

      Plus I find it ironic I played Crash before I even knew Mario Kart existed…

      1. Its funny becaise I played mario kart waaaay before Nitro kart ever exsisted. 98′(Mario kart) 02’or03′(Nitro kart) i think it was 03′ idk, but like a 5year difference.

  11. Some of the people complaining about how this isnt Nintendo related. Its mainly Sony related BUT it is Sony copying Nintendo so it does have a little bit to do with them…. and really?? your gonna complain about it? if you dont like the topic then dont even bother reading the post (WOW what a concept) I mean i’ve been following this site for awhile now and to be completly honest everytime i get on here latley its full of a bunch of people nagging, or complaining about things that are totally irrelevant… im sorry but alot of the people who have been on this site latley are just a bunch of whinners…

      1. Indeed. I like how people say “If you don’t like it don’t read it” and then proceed to complain about the posts they’ve been reading.

  12. I never thought it would come to this. It’s an automatic fail in my book for many reasons.
    1. Sony does not have any memorable or classic characters.
    2. They’d be copying the most popular fighting game in all video game history; not to mention the most successful.
    3. The title: “Fight,” sounds like some knockoff already.
    4. Sony is getting themselves into a load of shit for creating this.

    1. 1: your obviosly not a ps3 fan,

      2 is wrong… the most succesful Fighter would have to be either street fighter or Mortal kombat

      3 its simple, plus you cant complain about titles, nintendos next gens console is called The WiiU..

      4: the only getting shit from nintendo fanboys, 360 Fanboys dont give a shit, and Ps3 fanboys Welcome anything, as for legal right, Cartoon Network ripped Smash first and nothing happend

      1. Probably because 360 owners can’t really argue for or against this… if Sony’s cast is considered weak (which it isn’t, I can think up 8 GOOD characters right now; add 15 more for support characters… I’ll end up with around 30), then Microsoft’s line-up doesn’t even exist.

      2. 1. It true Sony doesn’t have memorable or classic characters. PS1 characters they had are gone that were Classic that is Crash and Spyro no more. Sack Boy, Kratos and Drake aren’t popular enough.

        2.Super Smash Bros Brawl sold 11 Million copies and Super Street Fighters IV only 4 million and Mortal Kombat is the same as Street Fighter I think. Super Smash Bros has more modes, characters, and action.

        3. WiiU has meaning it is meant for We casual gamers and you core gamers to unite in gaming.

        4. Fact that PS3 fanboys are the worst cause yall talk about how Nintendo Franchises suck when Sony went a copied the following
        Nintendo / Sony
        F-Zero Wipeout
        Kirby Littlebig Planet
        Mario Kart ModNation
        Zelda Ico
        Donkey Kong Ape Escape
        StarFox StarHawk
        Metroid Resistance
        Super Smash Bros Title Fight
        Kid Icarus God of War
        Wii Sports Move Sports games
        and the list goes on.

        1. 1) memorability ranges with the individual, there’s people who confuse link for Zelda, Samus for Metroid, and so on, some PS & 360 owners dont even know who they are, let alone know who Pit, Ness, G&W, or even Roy & Marth, hell some nintendo fanboys didn’t even know about about these characters until they played Smash. my point is, if you didn’t grow up with these characters, odds are, your not going to know who they are, so memorability ranges with the individual, (uncharted 3 sold over 3million its first day, GoW3 has sold over 33Million its first day, and im not sure about the sales for LittleBigPlanet but it debuted at 1 in the UK charts) how is that not popular??

          2) super smash brawl has made a revenue of over $550,000,000
          while Street Fighter II has passed the $2,000,000,000 mark… call me crazy, but i think 2 BILLION (2.3billion to be exact) is more than 550 Million.

          3) i know what Nintendo was trying to do, and i think the WiiU will be the best Console for games next gen gamers, considering Microsofts latest burst of Kinect games (and yes they suck) but it seems that’s the route their taking. as for sonys last statement about not improving much on graphical power for the ps4, and how they’ll be aiming to female gamers next gen (from what Phil Harrison stated at least) the ps4 will be having a buttload of shovelware. and yes i am getting a WiiU for my HD zelda, but the name is still Retarded.

          4) thats your opinion, ive seen Nintendo fanboys ON THIS SITE, just make complete asses of themselves, now im pretty sure theirs even worse fanboys out there, so im not going to say that PS/360/nintendo fanboys are the worst, ima just say that FANBOYS period are the worst. my point was, that because of this “rip off” (even though the rumor states that its going to play like MK) nintendo fanboys are the ones giving sony shit for it.

          Fzero/Wipeout – On the dot

          Kirby/LittlebigPlanet – not even remotely (if so, every sidescroller has been a copy of mario)

          MarioKart/ModNation – not really, Diddy kong racing, crashBandicoot racing, mickey speedway USA, sonic sega all stars, and even Blur are more like MK

          Zelda/Ico – no again, ICO is more like Monster Hunter, with a zelda story, and even then its not the same, hell, Fable is more like zelda

          Donkey Kong/Ape Escape – ape escape is about a boy catching Apes that have escaped in a 3d world environment, released in June 1999, DK first jump onto the 3d world wasnt untill November of 1999, and DK is about an ape trying to find his Stolen bananas

          StarFox/StarHawk – meh, starhawk is more of a Lost Planet or Gear/transformer rip off, than a star fox rip off

          Metroid/Resistance – not even remotely, if this is considered a rip off to you, then the CoD/MoH/TS/ and every first person shooter out there is a rip off of the Prime series, but then the prime series would be a rip off of Doom.

          Super Smash Bros/Title Fight – this is the worst comparison so far, 1) because the rumor says its going to play like MK, and 2) because we have yet to see any actual gameplay, or anything.

          Kid Icarus/God of War – kid icarus was a 2d sidescroller that was released in 1986 and it played like the metroid series, GoW was released in 2005 and its a HackNslash game. how do you even compare them??

          Wii Sports Move Sports games – This would have to be a perfect clone

          ps: i would love to see your list go On, and on.

  13. ZOMG why can’t sony be original Nintendo come’s and make this awesome fighting game when 4 people is on the stage and you have to knock them off and now sony whats to copy why can’t they make there own type of fighting game atari was being original with Dragon ball z budokai tenkaichi when you have something like a free world when you fight people who played that game know what im talking about but come on sony i wish you pull something original out your ass and why fuck is this post here this is a nintendo blog nintendo fans don’t give a damn sometimes sickr i think you like to piss nintendo fans off >_>

        1. It’s a RIPOFF because taken a Successful Fighting Game Idea of Gameplay and characters roster selection, and the music and stages that from each of the franchises games and developers of those game work together was Nintendo Idea.

  14. And according to rumors the game WILL PLAY LIKE Mortal Kombat. Not like SSB, because we can have violence in our games.

  15. They’ve been mentioned already but there are a couple of reasons why this won’t be anything special… Of that list of characters I only know two or three off the bat, whereas a lot of the Smash Bros staples are very well known, and in general very well liked. The actual system of fighting (where you accumulate damage as opposed to losing health) works great in Smash Bros because of the nature of the characters. Pikachu can quick attack back to the stage, Ness can blast himself back and so on. If they implement that it’ll be interesting to see how it works, but on the flip side if they don’t implement it then there’s nothing to separate it from any other fighting game…

    I find myself compelled to address this: “And according to rumors the game WILL PLAY LIKE Mortal Kombat. Not like SSB, because we can have violence in our games.” Anyone who still believes games need violence to make them great is living in the dark ages. I’m not saying violent games are bad, there are plenty of fun ones out there, but there’s no comparing Smash Bros and Mortal Kombat. They’re entirely different styles and if this new game takes after the latter there’s nothing to get too excited about.

  16. well if sony is copying smash bros, then they have officially run out of things to steal from nintendo. they were too late to copy mario as triniti interactive did it (youtube SUPER WORLD ADVENTURE). god sony sucks. the only reason why i’m buying a PS3 is cuz its the best damn blu-ray player out there.

    1. Raymond if your paying 250 for a bluray, you must be either, a moron, lying about having one, or you secretly love sony and want us to know.

      blurays go for about 100 even 80 at places.. GOOD blu-ray players too

  17. Crap, I thought the news title was about the next Smash Bros game for 3DS and Wii U… oh well. Sony, be sure to have Spyro in your little fighting game.

  18. Pingback: Sony's Smash Bros. clone basically confirmed, named 'Title Fight' - Nintendo 3DS Forums

  19. Oh… God

    No one look, it feeds on attention, if we pay none it might stop trying to exist

    Seriously? i thought this was one of those horrible, Horrible rumours that no one took seriously, but if it happens i think itll have the duke nukem effect

    Decent sales at first due to “Wtf, its real?” syndrome, till the “Oh GOD its Real.. and AWFUL!!” effect kicks in

  20. If its real then I wish sony luck and welcome the game! Theres finally a competitor for smash bros. This will drive both companies to be better than the other. Lets face it, super smash bro brawl sucked!! I unlocked everyone in just a few hours, boring! With sony entering the ring nintedo will hopefully make a better smash bros game next time.

    1. I felt like it was too slow, Brawl IMHO had to be the weakest of all 3 smash.. i hope they the new smash is more like melee.

        1. the characters felt to sluggish, and the ones that we’rent (pit & metaknight) were too over powered, and god, link and fox were completely stripped down… i did enjoy the trophies and the smash balls, they should keep that

          Ps: jigglypuff was a destruction house lol

    2. I don’t know what’s wrong with you guys, I found Brawl better than Melee (don’t know about the first though). The characters had better moves, more levels, and better balancing (this is generally why people like Melee more; their characters were more powerful in Melee). But then again, I like the slower, more strategic gameplay of Brawl where more skill and timing is involved, versus Melee’s quick-reaction style of gameplay.

  21. gentle men.we know that the game will fail because they dont have many and classic characters,they copied from nintendo as always they do,the game will have bad anventure because their characters exept from drake are for babys like ratchet and clank.sly cooper etc.but nintendos characters like super mario some peeople says that super mario is for babys because he talks awfull.they have problem,and super mario rocks OLD SCHOOL because is an original character from the creator shigerou miyamoto.ty from him now sony has their fucking ps3(in present).

  22. yea because nintendo made a cross-over fighting game and no one else can do something similar, even if that some one else has a good amount of IP. really why you guys are getting mad for, you should be proud that nintendo is leading the way in game ideas (not saying SCE has there own). im personally gonna get the game, sounds fun.

      1. ironic that you insult a COMPANY, not just the console, and still call him a fanboy. their should be a law were morons shouldnt be allowed on the internet

    1. only a twerp can get that game not a REAL gamer exept from sony fans.(microsoft and nintendo fanboys will never get this game because they know what they are doing)

      1. oh so now you could tell if someone is a “real” gamer or not?but i thought games were meant to be played for fun, not because you want to be a “true real” gamer, or am i wrong? you shouldn’t be talking about fanboy when you yourself are showing it in many different levels.

        1. and get a zelda game to play to see what is a real game.also nintendo with the zelda musics have done a symphony and it wrote history.sony didnt do nonthing.so i dont like that cooperation thats my third reason why i dont like it.

          1. bin playing SS since the 20th, got anything else to throw at me? and instead of being a troll how bout finishing your english homework bud, sounds good?

      2. I’n guessing you have a 360, because you’re a TAD biased… 360 owners are so deprived of exclusives this’ll simply make them angrier; even if Sony has a “ripoff”, it’s better than what 360 gamers have: nothing. In terms of good fighting game exclusives, that is.

  23. Super Smash Bros is amazing because of the characters and their stages, items, etc. Without Nintendo characters, how could it ever be fun?

  24. Hmmm… Alright this is.gonna be interesting, wonder how turn out into the end xO nothing compared to SSB but maybe worth a while playing!! anyway, back to playing super mario bros 2!! the original one, that came out later as the lost levels on snes, but for famicom x°

    1. haha they always do that.if sony always copy from niintendo thats meens that they dont have minds and creativities to make their own game.what a suck cooperation like microdick.but microdick hasnt stole many things as sony did.

  25. Get Ratchet and Clank along with Jak and Daxter and Sackboy and I’ll look into it.

    Honestly, the game does sound interesting and Sony has some nice exclusives. If I even had a PS3 though, I would get it. Those things are freaking expensive.

    1. HAHAHAAHA.ratchet and clank especially that game is for babys.lolz mate get an carina of time and a 3ds to see whats a truly game is!

        1. Don’t make fun of people playing “babyish games.” No offense to fanboys, but Nintendo is very kid friendly (which isn’t an insult). Do you really think Ocarina of Time is hardcore? Play Xbox 360 if you want hardcore. Nintendo fanboys take so much shit for their games being too “babyish.” If you insult Ratchet and Clank, than your no better than Sony fanboys. Thats an insult.

      1. OMFG, are you serious? SO you’re saying that a vast majority of Nintendo games aren’t for underage kids and are more suiting for a mature audience? FUCKING RETARD

        1. what? o_O
          Im saying that he shouldn’t criticize someone for playing a babyish game such as Ratchet and Clank when Nintendo creates a ton of kid-friendly games such as Mario, Kirby, and Pokemon.
          You need to take a chill pill. I can’t believe people get so worked up on this site, its really sad and pathetic.

  26. wow i am seriously suprized at how the sony fags are actualy defending sony at this one. like when they say ” this isn’t a clone until we see gameplay” or ” This might just be a clone of SF vs. Marvel or MK vs. DC “. First of all SF vs. Marvel and MK vs DC are crossovers between two other companies not the same first party company and second the reason this is clearly a clone and a bullshit copy of SSB is because they are uniting their own first party characters in one game fighting each other. Andmif you sony fags hate hardcore fan boys like me then get the fuck out of this site called My NINTENDO News, its like (sorry if i offend someone) yelling NIGGERS in a croud of African-americans. I don’t hate black people and yes i admit i am a fanboy like almost every one in this website i guess im the only one to admit it. im a fan boy and im not afraid to admit it, im proud.

  27. Many other companies had made their own smash bros clone and no one is complaining. Why is everyone complaining now????

    1. People complained back then, and even that Ninja Turtles Smash Up or whatever was critized because it was done by one of the teams that helped develop SSBB even using the same engine and was released on the PS2 as well. It’s just that every clone to this day has flopped. Sony is a direct competitor, so people get more wind of this.

      1. There were more smash bros clones even before Ninja Turtles Smash Up. Digimon Rumble Arena was released on the first Playstation. Digimon Rumble Arena 2 was released on all three consoles(GCN,PS2,Xbox). And Japan had a bunch of fighters similar to smash bros clones like Jump Ultimate Stars, D.O.N. and DreamMix TV World Fighters which featured Solid Snake.

        But I guess you are right about people getting pissed about Sony making the game. I for one can’t wait to see how it turns out. It’s better to have more games like Smash Bros since we only one Smash Bros. per generation.

  28. well anyway.i am calm because when the super smash bros 4 will come out it will kick sonys ash stupit and copied game!

  29. EnjoyVideoGamesPlz-Girl

    Look, it’s a fighting game !
    It sure is a copy of Super Smash Bros., like every other fighting game that was released after Super Smash Bros. on N64. /sarcasm
    Seriously, Sickr.
    You should better be posting Nintendo-News (this is a Nintendo-based blog after all… Or… Wasn’t it ?) instead of posting such non-sense. It seems like you enjoy seeing fanboys fighting. That’s kind of scary, you know ?
    And I like how people are calling the name “lame”. I’m positive that some of them would go all fanboy about it if it was Nintendo’s idea. Sad. And what’s it all about the name anyway ? Who does even give a fuck about the name of a game ? I actually thought it’s about the content and the gameplay… And to judge a game just by it’s name is pretty sad, too.
    I for myself am looking forward to this game, sounds really interesting. And I also do like the name. Not that it would matter, but yea (:

  30. If you look in a thesaurus, you’ll see that that another word for brawl is fight so maybe this really is a clone. And yes, this is Nintendo related because 1st party characters in one screen attacking each other to death(basically) sound familiar? I just think Nintendo is quicker in making games that are good.

  31. Sony are as creative with names as they are with ideas:
    “What do we call this motion controller we Move about?” “Ummmm…Move?” “Great!”
    “What do we call this fighting game?” “Uhhh…Fight?”

    I personally think the company is oblivious to Nintendo’s existence, except the R&D department who have a Wii that they play. Then When their boss comes, they show their “prototypes” such as their Wii MotionPlus Controller.

  32. Pingback: What "Sony Smash Bros" needs for success!

  33. This game is gonna FAIL because the FACT that if it is being develop now and they say it release during 2012 end that gonna call it a rush game. It gonna suck you aren’t gonna see any Franchises villains and of course Sony will add Cloud, Squall, Zidane, and all those Third parties characters they don’t own in it. It gonna be like 20 of theres and 10 TP Characters

    1. Let’s hope not. They don’t need to copy the controller that is similar to Wii U, Sony needs to come up with their OWN ideas. I bet that Sony is complaining saying that it’s too difficult. Well, I got one thing to say about that:
      DEAL WITH IT!!!! YOU are a gaming company. YOU’RE supposed to come up with your own ideas.

  34. You know what would be nice… If sony came up with an ORIGINAL idea instead of cloning everything that the other companies make because they see their own console failing, both sony and microsoft xbox can suck my wii

    1. Because Sony is cool: meaning Constipated, Overweighted, Out-of-style, Losers. Serious about the out-of style part since they can’t even make their own controller without looking up at Nintendo.

  35. Hey where’s Cole Macgrath from the infamous series, Spyro from the Spyro series and Ratchet from Ratchet and Clank series. I’m not gonna get this if it does not have them

  36. I’m confused how Sweet Tooth would play in a SSB-like fighting game… unless it’s some sort of kart racer? I could see Crash Bandicoot, or hell, even Sack Boy being fun to play this game with, but that’s about it. A guy from Killzone? REALLY? Wow. Nice try once again to copy Nintendo, Sony.

    Hopefully after this they learn to come up with their own ideas.

    1. Sweet Tooth would be the Wario of the Sony SB world…

      This game sounds so completely dumb though. I just can’t see it working…

  37. Is anyone else kind of excited about this game? It sounds friggin’ awesome sauce! I could totally see myself as Sly, kicking both my sibling’s ass as they play as Kratos and Sweet Tooth!

  38. Pingback: Sony’s Smash Bros. Clone Called “Title Fight” May Be Unveiled Soon | GoGoAnime

  39. Pingback: Sony supuestamente prepara un clon de Super Smash Bros. llamado Title Fight

Leave a Reply

Discover more from My Nintendo News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading